Latest Post

Why Rolla Academy Dubai is the Best Training Institute for IELTS Preparation Course Exclusive! Aston Martin AMR Valiant coming soon; details inside

[ad_1]

Taxpayers spent about $76,000 to fund Fred Prehn’s authorized battle to stay on the DNR coverage board after his time period expired. (Paul A. Smith/Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel through AP, File)

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin taxpayers spent about $76,000 to fund a state Division of Pure Assets coverage board member’s authorized battle to stay on the board after his time period expired, a information outlet reported Wednesday.

The Wisconsin State Journal stated it had obtained invoices via an open data request detailing state funds to Fred Prehn’s legal professional, Mark Macioek, between October 2021 and February 2022.

Former Republican Gov. Scott Walker appointed Prehn to the board in 2015. His time period expired in Could 2021 however he refused to step all the way down to make method for Democratic Gov. Tony Evers’ appointee, Sandra Naas. Prehn argued he didn’t want to go away till the state Senate confirmed Naas. Republicans who management the Senate have but to schedule a vote on Naas’ appointment.

Democratic Legal professional Normal Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit looking for a court docket order forcing Prehn off the board. The conservative-leaning state Surpeme Court docket dominated in Prehn’s favor in June.

After his time period ended, Prehn solid the deciding vote to extend the state wolf hunt quota and to scrap proposed limits on chemical compounds generally known as PFAS in groundwater. Earlier this month, although, he was a part of a unanimous board choice to restart the method to ascertain limits, a undertaking that can take years to finish.

Prehn introduced final week that he’ll resign from the board Friday. He stated it was time for the Senate to vote on Naas.



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply