[ad_1]
7th Circuit Court docket of Appeals
Case Title: United States of America v. Ronald Colbert
Case No.: 21-3245
Officers: Ripple, Rovner, and Brennan, Circuit Judges.
Focus: Affordable Suspicion – Suppression of Proof
Throughout a visitors cease, a detective and a police officer labored in tandem to look defendant Colbert’s car and frisk him, uncovering on his particular person a brick-shaped package deal later confirmed to comprise a managed substance. Colbert moved to suppress this proof, arguing that the frisk violated his constitutional rights. The district courtroom denied the movement, and Colbert entered a conditional responsible plea to possession with intent to distribute 40 grams or extra of a mix containing a detectable quantity of fentanyl in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a). On attraction, Colbert contends that the district courtroom erred to find that the officers had cheap suspicion to frisk him.
Viewing the totality of the circumstances, the officers had an inexpensive suspicion to conduct a Terry frisk. This conclusion is supported by the 7th Circuit’s latest determination in United States v. Radford, 39 F.4th 377 (seventh Cir. 2022), which introduced related information
Affirmed.
Determined 11/29/22
[ad_2]
Source link
