[ad_1]
Welcome to the primary of two six-team bye weeks this season. The Giants, Cowboys, 49ers, Broncos, Browns, and Steelers are off, so it is no shock that the Week 9 rankings are a bit thinner than traditional. As such, a dependable set of weekly fantasy projections is totally essential. In any case, the extra knowledgeable opinions, evaluation, and stats you may absorb, the extra it’s going to sharpen your Week 9 begin ‘em, sit ‘em choices.
To indicate we consider within the “extra is healthier” method to fantasy soccer analysis, we’re pleased to supply SN Fantasy readers an unique take a look at Draft Sharks’ award-winning weekly rankings and projections. We’ll additionally spotlight gamers at every place who stand out in our rankings in comparison with theirs so that you get a number of views on a number of of the most important start-or-sit complications. To see Draft Sharks’ unique Week 9 3D floor-to-ceiling projections, change into a Draft Sharks member at present on the hyperlink beneath!
TRY DRAFT SHARKS FREE: Dominate with exclusive tools, including Free-Agent Finder & Trade Navigator!
Week 9 Fantasy Soccer Projections, Rankings from Draft Sharks
Week 9 fantasy QB projections, rankings
Highlight Participant: Matthew Stafford, Rams @ Buccaneers (SN Rating: 14 | DS Rating: 21)
Name us gluttons for punishment, however we simply cannot utterly give up Stafford. Draft Sharks has clearly had sufficient, however we nonetheless see Stafford as a fringe starter so long as he has Cooper Kupp, Tyler Higbee, Allen Robinson II, and now Van Jefferson. Tampa’s protection has been struggling, so we nonetheless like Stafford’s flooring regardless of the less-than-stellar outcomes this 12 months (simply two multi-TD video games). Draft Sharks is eradicating Stafford’s identify worth and simply trying on the stats, which is all the time a sensible transfer.
SN’s WEEK 9 PPR RANKINGS:
QBs | RBs | WRs | TEs | D/STs | Kickers
Week 9 fantasy RB projections, rankings
Highlight Participant: Michael Carter, Jets vs. Payments (SN PPR Rating: 30 | DS Rating: 21)
Carter performed 56 % of snaps and noticed two extra carries and 6 extra targets final week than James Robinson, however it’s actually doable — maybe even probably — that Robinson performs extra this week. Both means, we merely do not belief Carter towards the Payments’ fourth-ranked run protection. Draft Sharks clearly thinks he can pad his PPR stats with some receptions, probably in rubbish time, however we nonetheless see him extra as a low-ceiling flex this week.
Highlight Participant: Clyde Edwards-Helaire, Chiefs vs. Titans (SN PPR Rating: 31 | DS Rating: 26)
We’re not that a lot totally different than Draft Sharks on Edwards-Helaire, however we wished to focus on him as a result of he is such a tricky working again to handicap. Maybe we must always have highlighted “starter” Isiah Pacheco, who we have now at No. 29 and Draft Sharks has at 35, however both means, it is clear each backs have comparable outlooks as flexes. Draft Sharks is a bit greater on CEH, most likely due to his pass-catching upside, however we’re leery about each Chiefs’ backs on this powerful matchup. Utilization will all the time be a priority, particularly after CEH performed simply 27 % of snaps in Kansas Metropolis’s final sport.
SN’s WEEK 9 STANDARD RANKINGS:
QBs | RBs | WRs | TEs | D/STs | Kickers
Week 9 fantasy WR projections, rankings
Highlight Participant: Demarcus Robinson, Ravens @ Saints (SN PPR Rating: 37 | DS Rating: 52)
Robinson would not have a lot of a monitor file this 12 months (15 catches, 25 targets), so our comparatively lofty rating relies nearly fully on his final sport (six catches, eight targets, 64 yards) and the favorable matchup (Saints permit fifth-most fantasy factors per sport to WRs). Rashod Bateman (foot) will likely be out once more, and TE Mark Andrews (shoulder, knee) can also be banged up. Robinson ought to see six-plus targets, and that is sufficient to get him within the WR3/flex territory for us. Draft Sharks is a bit leerier, which is smart given the Ravens’ low-volume passing assault.
Highlight Participant: Okay.J. Osborn, Vikings @ Commanders (SN PPR Rating: 55 | DS Rating: 37)
Osborn has seen 5 targets in every of the previous three video games, however he is turned that into simply 10 catches for 67 yards and a TD. Washington permits the seventh-most FPPG to WRs, so it is a great spot, however so long as each Adam Thielen and Justin Jefferson are wholesome, we see Osborn as merely a TD-or-bust desperation play.
TRY DRAFT SHARKS FREE: Dominate with exclusive tools, including Free-Agent Finder & Trade Navigator!
Week 9 fantasy TE projections, rankings
Highlight Participant: Robert Tonyan, Packers @ Lions (SN PPR Rating: 11 | DS Rating: 7)
We like Tonyan as a starter in 12-team leagues, primarily resulting from matchup (Detroit is permitting the fifth-most FPPG to TEs) and his pretty regular targets, however there are nonetheless causes to doubt him as an elite performer. He has only one sport this season with greater than 37 receiving yards, and he is solely scored as soon as. If Allen Lazard (shoulder) is again, that additionally complicates his workload after a season-high 74 % of snaps final week whereas Lazard was out. Once more, Tonyan has upside, however test your entire choices earlier than slotting him into your lineup.
Week 9 fantasy protection projections, rankings
Highlight Participant: Miami Dolphins @ Bears (SN Rankings: 13 | DS Rating: 5)
We felt like we have been overdoing it by placing the Dolphins at 13, so we’re not fairly positive how Draft Sharks received all of them the best way as much as No. 5 in its projections. The Bears are giving up the seventh-most FPPG to D/STs, so it’s a good matchup, however the Dolphins merely have not delivered on all their preseason promise this 12 months. They’ve compelled a turnover in simply three video games this 12 months (seven complete) and have allowed 24 or extra offensive factors in 4 of their previous 5 video games. In a shallow week, it is not unreasonable to start out Miami in 12-team leagues, however do not financial institution on the ‘Phins for assured manufacturing.
[ad_2]
Source link
